3 ms·
> Spam would still be hard, or arguably even harder Doesn't make any difference. The major sources of spam today are places like gmail and outlook servers. You
by jjav 3y ago
> Spam would still be hard, or arguably even harder
Doesn't make any difference. The major sources of spam today are places like gmail and outlook servers. You have to run some message classification regardless of where it came from.
- remus 3y ago> The major sources of spam today are places like gmail and outlook servers. By volume perhaps, but is that true as a proportion of all mail that was sent via these services? I'd be surprised, though I'd be very interested if there where any numbers publicly available.
- jjav 3y ago> By volume perhaps, but is that true as a proportion of all mail that was sent via these services? Would you care? I can say that I don't care (as someone running my own email infrastructure). I run filtering on all incoming email, I don't assign any weight to which email server it came from because it's not a useful factor.