3 ms·
> And if I do not, can you still be interested? I could be, but not by this rather idiosyncratic diatribe against intellectual arrogance, a domain which is in
by mannykannot 3y ago
> And if I do not, can you still be interested?
I could be, but not by this rather idiosyncratic diatribe against intellectual arrogance, a domain which is in any case far from being exclusively populated by physicists.
- mistermann 3y ago> I could be.... Could you (are you willing to, and will in fact do it) describe at least one set of conditions where you could be? > ...but not by this rather idiosyncratic diatribe against intellectual arrogance Can you explain why you believe this is necessarily (presumably) the case? Meta: - Is there a way or tone I could write in such that I could achieve the same level of logical rigour, but somehow bypass the natural, fundamental aversion to this sort of dialogue? - Do you believe it to be optimal that you can criticize/insult my performance, but my criticism/inquiry into particular details of of yours is ~non-valid/inappropriate/etc (I am assuming something like this is the case, please correct me if I am wrong)?