2 ms·
i think you have it backwards. giant teams == big risks, esp. if there isn`t strict and formal processes to eval the new contributors 3 people are easy to eva
by red-iron-pine 3y ago
i think you have it backwards. giant teams == big risks, esp. if there isn`t strict and formal processes to eval the new contributors
3 people are easy to evaluate, have been on the project forever, and presumably know what they`re doing.
C shouldn`t be a problem per se -- again, it`s been around a lot, and while it makes it easy to bork pointers, it`s not a meme language that we don`t know much about