3 ms·
Well, you don't wind up in such a situation by being completely passive about it. In another thread this month somebody formulated something so succinctly that
by fabianholzer 3y ago
Well, you don't wind up in such a situation by being completely passive about it. In another thread this month somebody formulated something so succinctly that I bookmarked it, just to be able to quote it in appropriate situations:
"I also concluded that doing meaningless administrative/management work is addictive and those who engage in it will actively and constantly try not only to overemphasise their importance but also force themselves on top of those who they know are doing actual important work. This is in my opinion a form of understated and poorly understood violence, but also a natural survival instinct for those who feel themselves useless (maybe correctly) and must then fight to remain relevant at all costs." (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39626648 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39626648)
So, while I think the situation is inherently not solvable in some manner where there is a real value added by this kind of role distribution, I think your technical colleagues will see and maybe to some extend even appreciate if you muster the decency to to minimize the amount of time & energy you take away.