I'm with the parent here, Vultr has been awesome for me and I'm a very happy customer. Very glad to see them walk this back. That said, while IANAL, I have bee

I'm with the parent here, Vultr has been awesome for me and I'm a very happy customer. Very glad to see them walk this back. That said, while IANAL, I have been involved in a relatively large number of contract negotiations. The TOS were ambiguous enough that our collective interpretation was almost certainly enforceable, if it came to that. The problem is that the definition of "user content" was so broad as to allow for almost no distinction between private and public uses of the data. So it's irksome that their lawyers blamed us non-lawyers, when from my perspective it was clearly Vultr's lawyers who failed here. But nevertheless I'm gonna take the win :-)