3 ms·
You'll note that AMD (and Nvidia, but that's expected) is unfortunately missing from the members list for UXL, which seems to be based on Intel's oneAPI which i
by sorenjan 3y ago
You'll note that AMD (and Nvidia, but that's expected) is unfortunately missing from the members list for UXL, which seems to be based on Intel's oneAPI which in turn is based in part on Khrono's SYCL:
> Our mission:
> • Build a multi-architecture multi-vendor software ecosystem for all accelerators.
> • Unify the heterogeneous compute ecosystem around open standards.
> • Build on and expand open-source projects for accelerated computing.
https://uxlfoundation.org/ https://uxlfoundation.org/
If AMD got their act together they would go all in on open standards together with other actors in the segment, but maybe they really want to see if their rocm can repeat Cuda's success and lock in? I just want accelerators to become commodities and interchangeable like CPUs, let me write my code once and deploy on whatever hardware the user have, preferably without having to compile multiple versions.