3 ms·
> However, he is not interested in open discussion, at least not if you mean honest by open. How do you conclude that? The only possible dishonesty I've seen
by daenz 14y ago
> However, he is not interested in open discussion, at least not if you mean honest by open.
How do you conclude that? The only possible dishonesty I've seen is about how the talk was handled, not the content of the talk. He seems all for open discussion of the content of the talk.
- daniel_solano 14y agoWell, it's not something that I have definitely concluded, but in my opinion, the speaker has lost significant credibility. If someone is willing to lie and bully in order to voice a particular opinion, why should I not expect them to lie or bully in trying persuade me to that opinion? No, it isn't a given, but that's the way I see it.