> No record for him nor his social security number seemed to check out This is the part that doesn't make sense. But the other sibling comment is probably righ

> No record for him nor his social security number seemed to check out This is the part that doesn't make sense. But the other sibling comment is probably right. It might have been before e-verify was widely in use. Besides, you just run through Checkr and friends unless you know the guy, so this "no record of him" thing would pop up these days. I suppose I'm not too concerned about this attack vector now that we have this stuff.