4 ms·
Sure, but in general the expected value of a HSM is that (especially in FIPS mode) it prevents extraction and accidental leakage of the keys (and maybe at appli
by cipherboy 3y ago
Sure, but in general the expected value of a HSM is that (especially in FIPS mode) it prevents extraction and accidental leakage of the keys (and maybe at appliance levels has explicit logging).
If you're sure you never do a plaintext backup or anything else that might leak the key, then it may not matter. But it is a decent defense in depth measure for high assurance operations.
I heard a story once about a CA (public? private? not sure!) that had an airgapped root CA in a basement lab, only for an enterprising admin to run an Ethernet cable between their desk and the basement lab to save themselves a few trips... An online HSM may allow effective leakage (by allowing arbitrary signing operations), but hopefully would prohibit export by a crypto user and retain audit logs of all operations to identify scope of the compromise.
At some point, you end up reinventing an HSM from first principals. :-) My 2c.