3 ms·
"Oh my how can we ever tackle this level of nuance", "But in case it helps" makes it clear you're arguing in bad faith instea dof looking for a discussion. You
by eska 3y ago
"Oh my how can we ever tackle this level of nuance", "But in case it helps" makes it clear you're arguing in bad faith instea dof looking for a discussion.
You ask "Are you playing dumb?", but then pretend " I don't know who David is." as if that's possible. It's pushed down high school students' throats. And if you googled it, then surely you'd remember that one time you saw it printed on cheap toilet paper in that hotel in Bangok.
When it suits your point it's "Nothing wrong with a woman deciding to sell pictures for an erotic pictures"
When it doesn't suit your point it's "from a porn shoot" and "THE standard test image" (instead of one of many)
- mort96 3y agoI'm arguing in good faith, I just don't think you are. I know many people called David. I didn't go to American high school, so no, one particular "David" was never pushed down my throat as the one canonical "David". I've also never been to Bangok, wherever that is (did you mean Bangkok? I haven't been there either) I did finally google it though and I guess I've seen a picture of that statue before, didn't know it was called Statue. Cool beans I don't understand what you're trying to say with that last part. There's nothing wrong with a woman selling erotic pictures from a porn shoot. I've been consistent on this from the beginning.