3 ms·
> Yes all of that stuff you posted was sure objective. That Emmanuel Goldstein...er..Elon Musk is the richest man in the world? That Elon Musk could wipe his b
by Turing_Machine 3y ago
> Yes all of that stuff you posted was sure objective.
That Emmanuel Goldstein...er..Elon Musk is the richest man in the world?
That Elon Musk could wipe his butt with $40 billion and still be incredibly rich?
That people have been predicting the immanent death of Twitter ever since Musk took over, and it's still there a year and a half later?
(Actually, it looks like Musk is down a bit today ($195B), and Bezos is (at least for today) slightly wealthier ($198B). But the point remains: if he lost every penny he put into Twitter, he'd still be wealthy far beyond his ability to spend it.)
It is utterly irrelevant whether or not Musk "made a mistake". I'm saying that it doesn't matter.
All of those are objective facts. If you have evidence otherwise, I'd be delighted to hear it.