3 ms·
Maybe, but Throne at least does a better job of obscuring it. A quick look at Throne shows no link to sex workers (their entire Twitter following is Twitch str
by explain 3y ago
Maybe, but Throne at least does a better job of obscuring it.
A quick look at Throne shows no link to sex workers (their entire Twitter following is Twitch streamers), while OP's service follows exclusively "brats", "dominatrixes", "findoms", etc.
Not attacking OP's service though.
- dragonwriter 3y ago> A quick look at Throne shows no link to sex workers (their entire Twitter following is Twitch streamers) It doesn't take much clicking through of the linktree/beacons/etc. links in their profiles to find that many of them are sex workers; “Twitch streamers” and “sex workers” are not exactly disjoint sets. But, yes, it looks like wishlistpage directly links on Twitter to accounts that are more in-your-face about being s/w accounts. And lazy targeting of services used largely by sex workers might be a viable explanation of the treatment seen.