4 ms·
I'd bet a lot of your users are OnlyFans girls or similar, unlike your competitors. That would be a problem out of Stripe's control and public pressure won't s
by explain 3y ago
I'd bet a lot of your users are OnlyFans girls or similar, unlike your competitors.
That would be a problem out of Stripe's control and public pressure won't solve that.
Just go straight for a payment provider which is set up to work with that kind of stuff.
- dragonwriter 3y ago> I'd bet a lot of your users are OnlyFans girls or similar, unlike your competitors. Pretty sure that would not be unlike the listed competitors, particularly Throne.
- explain 3y agoMaybe, but Throne at least does a better job of obscuring it. A quick look at Throne shows no link to sex workers (their entire Twitter following is Twitch streamers), while OP's service follows exclusively "brats", "dominatrixes", "findoms", etc. Not attacking OP's service though.
- dragonwriter 3y ago> A quick look at Throne shows no link to sex workers (their entire Twitter following is Twitch streamers) It doesn't take much clicking through of the linktree/beacons/etc. links in their profiles to find that many of them are sex workers; “Twitch streamers” and “sex workers” are not exactly disjoint sets. But, yes, it looks like wishlistpage directly links on Twitter to accounts that are more in-your-face about being s/w accounts. And lazy targeting of services used largely by sex workers might be a viable explanation of the treatment seen.