4 ms·
No, you misunderstand. High growth is not a ponzi scheme. High growth with no value is. Going flat is fine, Google did that. Losing a lot of traffic because
by ljlolel 14y ago
No, you misunderstand.
High growth is not a ponzi scheme. High growth with no value is. Going flat is fine, Google did that.
Losing a lot of traffic because people stop using your worthless site entirely is bad. Groupon will do that.
- mikeryan 14y agoHigh growth with no value is. No its not a Ponzi Scheme is a type of fraud where the con man pays out early investors from proceeds from later investors.
- gnaritas 14y agoAnd also includes the intent to defraud, otherwise insurance would meet your criteria.
- jbigelow76 14y agoI never really get the hate on Groupon from a business model standpoint, I get it from an execution standpoint but not the business model. I've derived quite a bit of value from Groupon myself, as have several people I know. They failed in execution because it appears they don't value their relationship with vendors as evidenced by not letting them impose limits in the number of coupons sold. Mom and Pop restaurants don't scale like startups and many were left with really bad experiences from being ill equipped to deal with a massive influx of customers in a short time frame, and consequently the customers ended up having a bad experience as well. This wasn't universal but it seems to have been frequent enough to have severely tarnished the brand. If Groupon had been better stewards of their relationships with their merchants instead of sacrificing them in the name of growth I don't think anybody would lump them into the "ponzi scheme" camp. Groupon could have gone about it differently, Bernie Madoff probably could not have.