3 ms·
why people pay for 3rd party VPNs? It's far more secure to create your own wireguard/openvpn/whatever with a cheap VPS
by tigrezno 3y ago
why people pay for 3rd party VPNs? It's far more secure to create your own wireguard/openvpn/whatever with a cheap VPS
- MissTake 3y agoBecause most people are not techies. Compared to the rest of the world, the number of people who even know what a VPS is is microscopically small. And even those that do, the number of them with the time, desire, or skill, to do as you suggest, is even smaller. I myself was into this sort of thing just 10 years ago. Now, as I start looking at hitting the big 6-0 in just a few years time, I’m already working on divesting myself of all this complexity,
- orthoxerox 3y agoNot everyone is savvy enough to do it, even though the process has been simplified with many hosting providers providing preconfigured VPN servers. And it doesn't anonymize you that well. When you post a message that draws the attention of law enforcement, the IP will lead them to a VPN provider that hopefully doesn't keep any logs. But if it leads them to a specific server, the hosting provider will disclose your account and payment data, since it is linked to your private server. Unless they accept fully pseudonymous accounts and let you pay for your VPS in cash, Monero or tumbled Bitcoins, finding you is much easier now.
- thegrim000 3y agoI find it so insane that people think the major VPN providers aren't all completely compromised one way or the other. As if you're really going to be able to just pass your traffic through such a business and they're going to actually keep no logs, and not have secret deals made with intelligence agencies, and aren't unknowingly completely insided/compromised by intelligence agencies. As if you can just push your traffic through a major VPN and intelligence agencies would just go "well shucks, oh man, they sure got us, we'll never know who it was, foiled again".
- dewey 3y ago> I find it so insane that people think the major VPN providers aren't all completely compromised one way or the other. For 99.9% of people a VPN is just something they use to access something in another country or because some YouTube ad scared them into believing you need a VPN as soon as you step into a coffee shop. The threat model of most people does not include state actors or intelligence actors and they just don’t care.
- almostnormal 3y agoOftentimes, it's not about security but about circumventing censorship. A cheap VPS comes with a fixed IP located in one fixed part of the world. Many VPN providers allow switching.
- byyll 3y agoMy €5 VPN allows me to use 500 IPs in 50 countries. Give me the VPS that allows me to do that.
- k8sToGo 3y agoWhich service do you use? Mullvad?
- defrost 3y agoThat could be either Mullvad or ProtonVPN. Both are Swiss zero log, Mullvad has a flat 5 euro/month charge that goes back to when they started to (they say) forever - you can send them cash in envolope for the next twenty years with a generated account number and you're away. ProtonVPN has plans - the two year streaming sign up is 4.99 euro/month.
- xvector 3y agoAh, good 'ole trustworthy Swiss companies! Like Crypto AG![1] Realistically, all VPNs are compromised. But for most people's threat model, that's irrelevant anyways. Proton for instance revealed the location of a climate activist leading to his arrest[2], with the inspiring message from the CEO that "privacy protections can be suspended", silently on a per-user basis at any time. Haven't seen anything like that for Mullvad, but it's probably the same. At least the company takes crypto. But these things are always just surface level obscurity at best. [1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crypto_AG https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crypto_AG [2]: https://techcrunch.com/2021/09/06/protonmail-logged-ip-address-of-french-activist-after-order-by-swiss-authorities/ https://techcrunch.com/2021/09/06/protonmail-logged-ip-addre...
- andsoitis 3y ago> Proton for instance revealed the location of a climate activist leading to his arrest[2], with the inspiring message from the CEO that "privacy protections can be suspended", silently on a per-user basis at any time. That person isn't just a climate activist, they (and others who used that email account) broke French laws. Swiss authorities compelled the disclosure.
- account-5 3y agoYou have to trust someone somewhere. You're simply placing your trust in the VPS provider instead of a third party VPN provider. Not to mention the other stuff the VPN providers give you as standard which you'd have to implement and maintain yourself.
- maple3142 3y agoIt really depends on why are you trying to do. It is not easy (or just impossible) to get the same amount of ip with that $5/mo or $10/mo VPN services by renting your own VPS at the same price.
- linksbro 3y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224
- felsokning 3y ago> why people pay for 3rd party VPNs? It's far more secure to create your own wireguard/openvpn/whatever with a cheap VPS Your comment seems to infer that you're unable to empathize with people who might think/understand differently than you. It also seems to negate that you avail of other services/non-self-controlled processes without worrying about the threat models, there. Just hand-waiving with a "Why don't people just do 'x'?" is ironic - in the sense of "Why do you do your own medical care?" or "Why don't you grow your own food and slaughter your own animals?" or "Why don't you manufacture your own phone, it's operating system - oh, and the cellular tower closest to you?". Threat models exist, _everywhere_, and it's impossible for someone to build all of the pieces, themselves, to prevent all threat models at every possible avenue/point. In other words, at a non-arbitrary point, doing _everything_ yourself is untenable and that's precisely why services in society exist, today (that and ease of access, use, required foreknowledge, and - most notably - cost).