3 ms·
The argument is that the company could have preserved their forest because it would’ve been more profitable to keep it. That old growth or near old growth fore
by ant6n 3y ago
The argument is that the company could have preserved their forest because it would’ve been more profitable to keep it.
That old growth or near old growth forest of red woods shouldn’t be harvested at all is a separate issue, has little to do with Star Wars, except that Star Wars vi was shot in such a forest.