3 ms·
Your first remark is irrelevant because he didn't just reside in the US. He is/was a US citizen. This is not an issue of whether or not the investor should pay
by cantankerous 14y ago
Your first remark is irrelevant because he didn't just reside in the US. He is/was a US citizen. This is not an issue of whether or not the investor should pay income taxes on top of it or not. This is a tangential issue that is not what's being debated, though it is a reason that a lot of people get upset.