4 ms·
>I used to use it back on Windows 95 because it was a faster way to view JPEGs than opening Internet Explorer. That's an amazing sentence. We should frame it a
by AlienRobot 3y ago
>I used to use it back on Windows 95 because it was a faster way to view JPEGs than opening Internet Explorer.
That's an amazing sentence. We should frame it and put it in a museum. Actually someone should make a book filled just with quotes like this, call it "Life Before the Gigahertz" or something.
- necubi 3y agoI see so many comments these days bemoaning how slow modern software has gotten, but no one seems to remember/have been alive for the time when just rendering an image would take multiple seconds. Just goes to show that our expectations scale with the available technology.
- muxator 3y agoAnd now decoding a jpeg takes the blink of an eye, but we wait five seconds for a widget to render. When it does, we click somewhere else, because in that exact moment the layout was reflown.
- bdhcuidbebe 3y agoi remember watching images download and how relevant progressive rendering was. blurry shapes!
- Terr_ 3y agoNews quotes followed by a link to an audio file that discloses its length and probable (larger) time to download.