4 ms·
It's sophmoric to go "well, akshually, the law says..." when we're talking about corrupt bureaucrats with a history of enabling, covering up, and abetting in ra
by Solvency 3y ago
It's sophmoric to go "well, akshually, the law says..." when we're talking about corrupt bureaucrats with a history of enabling, covering up, and abetting in rampant environmental disasters (eg: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Susana_Field_Laboratory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Susana_Field_Laboratory). Cool, you're at stage 2 of viewing the world, which is really just trying to use faux rationality to cognitively disassociate from the nonsense evil going on in the world.
Stage 3 is letting decades of this nonsense erode this "academic" view and saying enough is enough.
I don't care what bureaucratic legalese these assholes are guarding their motives with, it's all 100% down to money. Money is flowing here between corporations and government, and that's the ultimate incentive behind these decisions.
- yieldcrv 3y agothe EPA bringing reaching the same conclusion the way the court pointed out is completely fine by me what I can't get behind is your version where the authority you like can do anything you like in any way. you're assuming this is an example of "corrupt bureaucrats with a history of enabling, covering up, and abetting in rampant environmental disasters" and this is copypasta for any topic where something was curbed.