2 ms·

I don't object to removal itself, and I don't find it too appropriate, I just have problems with post-hoc rationalization that comes attached to it. "Images of

• acdha 3y ago
  It’s not attractive women but pornography. Nobody would care if this was a picture a computer scientist had taken of herself at work because they needed a test image, it’s the “produced for the sexual pleasure of male viewers” part that makes some people worry that their colleagues view them the same way.
  • numpad0 3y ago
    > Nobody would care if this was a picture a computer scientist had taken of herself at work because they needed a test image I've seen, although from great distances, enough of these instances. They WILL come at that person and harder in those cases. Sexual content are less likely to be cancelled when more male is involved, contrary to superficial reasoning. This applies even if gender of creators are not apparent at all. It's a really gross primal phenomenon.
    • acdha 3y ago
      Do you have any examples? I’ve never heard of anything remotely like that happening. > Sexual content are less likely to be cancelled when more male is involved, contrary to superficial reasoning. It’s true that many men don’t mind sexualizing women, but that’s restating the problem that this creates a hostile atmosphere for everyone else.
• matsemann 3y ago
  > That'll be one hell of a hallucination if an LLM said it. And it's also an hallucination when you say it, given that it's not even close to the issues raised and just a straw man.