3 ms·

> systemd's call to dlopen() liblzma library (CVE-2024-3094) That's technically wrong, but no surprise. Anti-systemd trolls usually don't understand technical

> systemd's call to dlopen() liblzma library (CVE-2024-3094) That's technically wrong, but no surprise. Anti-systemd trolls usually don't understand technical details after all.

jaromilrojo 3y ago
It is 10 and more years that I experience such ad-hominem attacks. You are so quickly labeling an identifiable professional as troll, while hiding behind your throwaway identity, that I am confident readers will be able to discern. Meanwhile let us be precise and add more facts https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/31550 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/31550 Our community is swamped by people like you, so I will refrain from answering further provocations, believing I have provided enough details to back my assertion.
- throwaway7356 3y ago
  That MR is not part of any released version of systemd. That is simply to verify: there has been no new systemd release. So much for the "facts". As for trolling: just look at the usual contributions from your community like https://twitter.com/DevuanOrg/status/1619013961629995008 https://twitter.com/DevuanOrg/status/1619013961629995008 Excellent work with the ad-hominem attacks there.
  - lamp987 3y ago
    It's already accepted and merged into master so it will be released in a future systemd release. What's your point? LP in da house?
    - throwaway7356 3y ago
      The MR linked to would actually prevent the backdoor from working, but that doesn't stop some people from claiming it enables the backdoor. But as already said: no surprise given where the comment comes from.
      - lamp987 3y ago
        That's not the point I'm replying to. You were lying and I pointed that out.
- temp12237792 3y ago
  Can you explain in simple words that even a non programmer can understand, what the linked PR does?