4 ms·
This is how I remembered it as well. Kind of preferred Google Code over GitHub for a while. Or at least until it had enough functionality and/or tools to suppo
by asabla 3y ago
This is how I remembered it as well.
Kind of preferred Google Code over GitHub for a while. Or at least until it had enough functionality and/or tools to support it.
Almost feels like it's time again for a shift...but it will probably be a while
- 3seashells 3y agoWe are in that phase we're non ms incompatible features will be added to mgit and the flesh eating plant slowly closes shut.
- a_random_canuck 3y agoHonestly it’s been time for a shift ever since they were bought by Microsoft…
- ladzoppelin 3y agoYeah doesn't something this important need lots of money and accountability behind it so if sh@t hits the fan, its their burden and not an underfunded team. Like look at the XZ thing, things can get really serious really quick. I am not saying its a perfect situation but Github actions and the enterprise features are actually really good and I don't understand how any team smaller than the big 3 could handle the amount of data/users/traffic/importance that Github has become. Just an opinion ..
- robertlagrant 3y agoIt would be good if they gitlab and gitea standardised some features such as how to track issues in a repo, to make a baseline of portability available. Then they can say migrate to one of us from GitHub using this special tool, and then you'll have a nice portable repo from then on. That might help a little with the transition, ready for when MS does one of their crazy moves and people suddenly want to switch.