> Except "people" didn't make this ban, IEEE did. Isn't IEEE made up of people? > If people don't want to work with this image, then they might as well not wo

> Except "people" didn't make this ban, IEEE did. Isn't IEEE made up of people? > If people don't want to work with this image, then they might as well not work with it? Lucky for you that you're oblivious to these kind of issues, but it's not as easy as you portray it to be. Most people will shut up and "just accept it" to not stir the pot. People aren't writing a paper in isolation using this, so can't easily just switch if the rest of the community uses it to benchmark, the co-authors want to use it etc. > and convince people like you that it's ok to do that. Please define "people like me". Tread carefully. > and when you keep defending it using other arguments which are not the ones that led to the ban, you're just feeding a monster. Don't lie. I've only used the arguments put forward by IEEE in the article.