3 ms·
It is not as simple as you put because the decision was not technical, it was political/ideological. To discuss its technical relevance is meaningless; everybod
by low_tech_love 3y ago
It is not as simple as you put because the decision was not technical, it was political/ideological. To discuss its technical relevance is meaningless; everybody knows the image is bad and should not be used in 2024. The fact that it is still used is a testament to the deplorable situation of academia itself, but has nothing to do with this ban. They banned it because (a few, very loud) women felt uncomfortable about it and decided to turn it into a crusade. And IEEE (as with most other organizations nowadays) are rightfully scared to make a fuss over something so small and petty. It's a small, almost meaningless loss for the IEEE, and a big meaningful win for those who actually care about something like this. And so it goes, little by little, they win.
- SpecialistK 3y agoYou may have a point, it isn't my fight because it's not my field and it doesn't personally offend me. I would probably feel different if it was porting Doom to every platform ever that was under scrutiny. And if that comes up, I would be more defensive and philosophical about it. I both know about and care about it more. So I'm going to ponder on that for a bit.