3 ms·
Note that if you just want to provide a issue tracker within Git rather than relying on centralized web services like Github or Gitlab, there is https://github
by nextaccountic 3y ago
Note that if you just want to provide a issue tracker within Git rather than relying on centralized web services like Github or Gitlab, there is
https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug
https://github.com/dspinellis/git-issue https://github.com/dspinellis/git-issue
https://sciit.gitlab.io/sciit/ https://sciit.gitlab.io/sciit/ (this one has a list of alternatives here https://sciit.gitlab.io/sciit/#other-distributed-issue-trackers https://sciit.gitlab.io/sciit/#other-distributed-issue-track...)
Overall it's very disappointing that Github didn't decide to embed issue tracking (and also PR discussions) inside the repository (in another branch perhaps). Issue discussion is part of documentation IMO, and not distributing it alongside the repository causes lock-in
- crotchfire 3y agoUnfortunately github appears to be actively breaking the ability to use git-bug on repositories with large numbers of pull requests (like nixpkgs): https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug/issues/749#issuecomment-1072991272 https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug/issues/749#issuecomme... They really don't want you to leave their walled garden.