I don't agree with everything in this article, but it is even more tiresome reading some of the comments here. Keep in mind that a lot of people are working rea

I don't agree with everything in this article, but it is even more tiresome reading some of the comments here. Keep in mind that a lot of people are working really hard to get wayland to where it should be. This is HN and it would be cool to show support to the technical improvements and the security benefits of the whole wayland stack. Its fine if it is "no worky" for you. The goal is get it to work for everyone and actual reports on what does not work is much more helpful than philosophical arguments about wayland that have been ongoing for years. Also you are not being forced to use it. Stick with i3, its fine. I think there are already quite a few user benefits that come with wayland and for me wayland and XWayland works very well for all applications I use with the exception of some java guis. (that is also being worked on) All of that beeing said, developing protocols and implementing them on multiple sides is just a slow process and we are not 100% there yet.