3 ms·
> Despite all this, though, the MX-30 R-EV still falls somewhat short, with a catalog fuel efficiency of 15.4 kilometers per liter (as measured in WLTC mode). W
by SeanLuke 3y ago
> Despite all this, though, the MX-30 R-EV still falls somewhat short, with a catalog fuel efficiency of 15.4 kilometers per liter (as measured in WLTC mode). With no similar vehicles on the market, like-for-like comparison is not possible, although the Toyota RAV4 plug-in hybrid gets 22.2 km/l, while the Prius plug-in hybrid gets 26.0 km/l. The MX-30 R-EV is clearly inferior in terms of its fuel economy.
That's because the engine serves an entirely different purpose. The Prius plug-in hybrid is a 13.6kWh battery mated to a regular engine. The MX-30 R-EV is a 17.8 kWh battery mated to a tiny ultralight emergency range extender.
As to similar designed cars, um, hello, the BMW I3 Hybrid? Exactly the same design.
The failing of the MX-30 R-EV is that its battery size is pathetically small for what amounts to an EV with a range extender. It is an embarrassment.
- tom_ 3y agoI wonder how many people drive far enough to regularly need the range extender before they have a chance to plug it in. The fuel economy of this thing is not great if you drive it far enough that it runs out of petrol and you need to fill it up again - but what if you rarely do that? What if you usually drive less than about 50 miles before the next opportunity to recharge it?