4 ms·
It really isn't. Go and drive a 13BT car. They make almost all their torque by 2500rpm and the curve is flat. They're more torquey than any 4 cylinder I've driv
by suprjami 3y ago
It really isn't. Go and drive a 13BT car. They make almost all their torque by 2500rpm and the curve is flat. They're more torquey than any 4 cylinder I've driven.
- _ea1k 3y agoI've owned an RX-7 and an RX-8. They definitely didn't have flat torque curves. Even the twin sequential setup on the FC was far from flat. But even if it was, that was the most powerful stock configuration made and it topped out at ~184 lb/ft. :) Torque was never the strength of this motor.
- suprjami 3y agoI had a turbo FC and beg to differ. A dyno graph of a stock car also begs to differ.
- _ea1k 3y agoDyno graphs aren't consistent with that: https://www.google.com/imgres?q=1993%20stock%20rx-7%20dyno&imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rx7club.com%2Fattachments%2F3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16%2F408684d1288238017-13b-rew-stock-dynosheet-compared-stock-dynosheets-other-turbo-engines-evox_stock_dyno.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rx7club.com%2F3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16%2F13b-rew-stock-dynosheet-compared-stock-dynosheets-other-turbo-engines-928507%2F&docid=3yaHKYIiVZ-OsM&tbnid=T9m9rGov8hxrRM&vet=12ahUKEwiEieuz36iFAxWv3ckDHZKvD3gQM3oECEoQAA..i&w=823&h=636&hcb=2&ved=2ahUKEwiEieuz36iFAxWv3ckDHZKvD3gQM3oECEoQAA https://www.google.com/imgres?q=1993%20stock%20rx-7%20dyno&i... They are fun engines, but low end torque just isn't their thing.