40 ms·
No, you skipped the context, which says that in the introduction you talk about special cases to build intuition, and then provide the general result in the tec
by Ar-Curunir 3y ago
No, you skipped the context, which says that in the introduction you talk about special cases to build intuition, and then provide the general result in the technical part.
- twelfthnight 3y agoHuh, I guess I missed the part about providing the general result in the technical part (still don't see it, but that makes sense), ultimately that does seem like a good idea. At least I've heard we understand better from examples first and then generalities. My (admittedly grumpy) gripe is more that the aim of the blog is that "dull" is bad and suggests to add/subtract candid mathematics with "heroes" and "conflict". If the paper isn't _clear_, that's one thing, but "trick"ing the reader to spend more time on your article than they would without the embellishment is patronizing at best and disingenuous at worst.