3 ms·
There are two points to the implementation: * Choice. If I have a separate implementation, my users do not have to be subject to systemd's choices. And I do no
by gavinhoward 3y ago
There are two points to the implementation:
* Choice. If I have a separate implementation, my users do not have to be subject to systemd's choices. And I do not either.
* The same implementation will have the same bugs, so in the same way that redundant software has multiple independent implementations, having an independent implementation will avoid the same bugs. It may have different bugs, sure, but my goal would be to test like SQLite and achieve DO-178C certification. Or as close as I could, anyway.
- iforgotpassword 3y agoI'd assume chances of monetizing this are incredibly low. There already is an init system that understands systemd unit files, the name escapes my mind unfortunately. DO-178C might be a selling point literally, but whether there's enough potential customers for ROI is questionable.
- gavinhoward 3y agoI unfortunately agree with you. Hence why it's on the backburner.
- JdeBP 3y agoAhem! * https://jdebp.uk/Softwares/nosh/guide/converting-systemd-units.html https://jdebp.uk/Softwares/nosh/guide/converting-systemd-uni...