4 ms·
From their Git commits, they're in China's time zone.
by computerfriend 3y ago
From their Git commits, they're in China's time zone.
- stephenr 3y agoI assume you mean UTC+8... that covers about 20% of the earth's population, besides China it includes parts of Russia, a bunch of SEA and Western Australia.
- fmajid 3y agoChina is 20& of the world's population...
- jcgrillo 3y agoMy git commits are sometimes in UTC, depending on which computer I make them from. Sometimes my laptop just switches timezones depending on whether I'm using wifi or LTE. I wouldn't put much weight on the timezone.
- jnxx 3y agoThe time stamp of a git commit depends on the system clock of the computer the commit was checked in. This cannot be checked by github & co (except that they could reject commits which have time stamps in the future).
- supposemaybe 3y agoRemember that agencies like NSA, GCHQ etc will always use false flags in their code, even when it doesn’t have as high risk of exposure as a backdoor in public has. Looking at the times of commits shouldn’t be given much value at all. A pretty pointless endeavour.
- astrange 3y agoState actors are actually known for not doing that; after all, there's no need to hide when what you're doing is legal. They also tend to work 9-5 in their own timezones.
- account42 3y agoIt might be legal but would (or at least should) be seen as an attack by all other countries using the software, even allies, and in a saner world wouldl receive a strong political response.
- berdario 3y agoBut the actual interactions with Github are done between 12.00 UTC and 18.00 UTC https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39870925 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39870925 https://play.clickhouse.com/play?user=play#U0VMRUNUIHRvSG91cihjcmVhdGVkX2F0KSBBUyBob3VyLCBjb3VudCgqKSBGUk9NIGdpdGh1Yl9ldmVudHMgV0hFUkUgYWN0b3JfbG9naW49J0ppYVQ3NScgR1JPVVAgQlkgaG91ciBPUkRFUiBCWSBob3Vy https://play.clickhouse.com/play?user=play#U0VMRUNUIHRvSG91c...
- zone411 3y agoBut note this: https://twitter.com/birchb0y/status/1773871381890924872/photo/1 https://twitter.com/birchb0y/status/1773871381890924872/phot...
- berdario 3y agoInteresting! As some of the Tweet replies mentioned, they shipped releases that contained the backdoor, and committed other questionable changes at the "usual" times. For sure we're almost certainly not dealing with a compromised workstation, so I don't think that would explain the different times for the worst offending changes. Maybe he has some technical experts/handlers/managers that had to oversee when they introduced the actual malicious changes, and thus this reflects when he got the go-ahead signal from these other people (and thus that reflects their working hours?) Or maybe they were just travelling at that time? (maybe travelling to visit the aforementioned handlers? Or travel to visit family... even criminals have a mom and dad) Also, keep in mind that my Clickhouse query includes all of the Github interactions (for example, timestamp of issue comments)... and unlike a Git commit timestamp, it's hard to fake those (because you'd need to schedule the posting of such comments, probably via the API. Not impossible, but easier to think that JiaT75 just used the Gitub UI to write comments), the Tweet mentions just "commit history" Usually the simpler explanation has less chance of being wrong... thinking of some possibilities: - Chinese/Taiwanese state actor, who employs people 9-5 (but somehow, their guy worked 20.00 - 02.00 local time) - Chinese/Taiwanese rogue group/lone wolf... moonlighting on this exploit after their day job (given that to interact with Lasse they'd be forced to work late, this is not outside of the realm of possibilities) - Non-Chinese state actor, employing someone 9-5 (consistent with most of the Github interactions), wanting to pin responsibility on China/Taiwan (+0800 timezone for commits), which for some unexplained reason pushed the worst offending changes at really weird times. - Chinese/Taiwanese state actor, that wanted to pin the blame on western state actors (by making all of the changes at times compatible with someone working in Europe), and somehow they slipped up when pushing the worst offending changes. - Chinese/Taiwanese state actor, employing someone in Europe (if they need to get approval of changes/gain the trust of the previous maintainer Lasse, it might make sense to have better/more timezone overlap)... which for some weird (yet "innocent") reason, kept the device that they worked on, configured with a +0800 timezone - Non-Chinese state actor, pretending to be a Chinese entity that wanted to pin the blame on a western entity and slip up by making the worst offending changes at 3am (i.e. it was not a slip up, but it's part of the misdirection efforts.) Some of these hypotheses are a bit farfetched, but reality is stranger than fiction