4 ms·
And that's absolutely an argument I will support! and very much do care about. It's just a fundamentally different argument to "Well clearly, arbitrary species
by NikolaNovak 3y ago
And that's absolutely an argument I will support! and very much do care about.
It's just a fundamentally different argument to "Well clearly, arbitrary species A here at some arbitrary time B is the natural and morally right owner of these lands".
- generic92034 3y agoAs long as this is not seen as justification to displace any other species just when we feel like it (because they probably displaced some other species), I can agree.
- digging 3y agoWere bears completely extinct in the area and reintroduced from elsewhere? If not, there's no arbitrary line being drawn whatsoever. It's currently bear habitat.
- kelnos 3y ago> "Well clearly, arbitrary species A here at some arbitrary time B is the natural and morally right owner of these lands". Which is not what the person you replied to said. I read it as "bears were there first, don't be surprised when you move there and find bears".