And how many of those are paying for a commercial license instead of using it under SSPL license? > words need interpretation and both SSPL and AGPL are writte

And how many of those are paying for a commercial license instead of using it under SSPL license? > words need interpretation and both SSPL and AGPL are written vaguely. Absolutely, but that doesn't mean you should take the risk. They are both crap licenses imho and our lawyers are not allowing either of them inside anything. And I hear that from all big corp peeps I speak to; except the same software with a commercial license (which will happen to many in the Redis case and it happened in the Mongo case; it's a good bat to beat money out of companies). The point is that 'vague' is a red flag and unless you have a bone to pick, your law dept is not going to allow it which is the intended reaction to sspl by people licensing that way. You offer dual sspl or commercial; sspl will put you in danger, so you just fork over $.