> And anything they do with the content can be explained away as "necessary to provide the service". That's the problem: they're not constraining themselves in

> And anything they do with the content can be explained away as "necessary to provide the service". That's the problem: they're not constraining themselves in any way. They need money to provide the service, so why couldn't they decide that taking art I put on my server and selling it to people is "necessary to provide the service"? It seems like they could at any time decide that their pricing is unsustainable, so monetising customer content is "necessary to provide the service". That's not how contract interpretation works.