You know what, you're right. The sinner rolls out a distraction, and we should all jump on it like cats to a ball of yarn. Politicians do it? Why shouldn't "jo

You know what, you're right. The sinner rolls out a distraction, and we should all jump on it like cats to a ball of yarn. Politicians do it? Why shouldn't "journalists"? True story: I was raised by parents who taught, "Consider the source." The point is, if NPR had any integrity and was aware of journalistic standards it would hush-up and look in the mirror. But why do that when there are (down-voting) fools who will attack the messenger instead of considering the source? Good job citizen. You and your ilk are part of the problem. Bonus points: Commit the phase, "just because you can, doesn't mean you should." In this case, HN is suppose to have standards. Something being shared here doesn't make it comment-worth, and when it's not that should be pointed out and why. In short, you're welcome. smh