3 ms·
Similarly an empty input field that is css'd to be outside the viewport is often filled by spambots but not humans. But I like the edge case UX of your idea mor
by kqr 3y ago
Similarly an empty input field that is css'd to be outside the viewport is often filled by spambots but not humans. But I like the edge case UX of your idea more.
- jeffhuys 3y agoJust watch out that Chrome’s autofill doesn’t fill it in. Cost us a huge chunk of new signups until we found out. Chrome ignores autofill directives under some circumstances.
- kqr 3y agoIt's also visible for users with CSS overrides and/or other browser inpairments. The more I think about it the more strongly I prefer the "type 42" explicit input field.
- thih9 3y agoYou can label it “leave this field empty”, with a placeholder or similar - then it’s the same explicit instruction as “type 42”.