5 ms·
Some possible counterarguments: 1. Mathematics is a lot more abstract than it used to be. 2. Mathematics is a lot more specialised than it used to be. 3. Non
by mayd 3y ago
Some possible counterarguments:
1. Mathematics is a lot more abstract than it used to be.
2. Mathematics is a lot more specialised than it used to be.
3. Non-mathematical content is inaccessible to those who don't read English.
4. Space in academic journals is too precious to waste on inessential content.
5. The style is part of a universal mathematical culture so you should fit in.
6. There are many alternative places to publish nontechnical academic writing.
- sweezyjeezy 3y ago> Space in academic journals is too precious to waste on inessential content Not the biggest issue in maths - the arxiv version usually won't match the journal version 1:1
- melagonster 3y agoand they publish on internet, solid copy is not popular today.
- jcla1 3y agoRegarding you last point: out of interest, what kind of venues were you thinking of? Be this personal blogs of said academics, just dumping it on a preprint server or actual ("formally published") publications?
- Ekaros 3y agoFor last point. Maybe the universities should step up and use that massive administration machine they have build for this publishing. Just post it on one of their websites. Link to the original paper in the prestigious journal.
- lupire 3y ago#5 being exclusionary to people with different/better ideas/practices is not an pillar worth preserving.
- Ar-Curunir 3y ago"Space in academic journals is precious" Well thank god we have preprint servers which have no such stupid requirements.