It seems like the logic for the lawsuit is that Snapchat and other advertisers had something in their ToS with words to the effect of "thou shalt not let our co

It seems like the logic for the lawsuit is that Snapchat and other advertisers had something in their ToS with words to the effect of "thou shalt not let our competitors packet capture our traffic" and Facebook induced the customers to breach that agreement. The Wiretap Act stuff seems like nonsense though. If the consumer installed software with their informed consent to record their phone use, that's not illegal wiretapping.