3 ms·
The "camel means rope" story, while cute and not implausible, is basically a guess. All the earliest available sources say "camel" - there is no actual evidence
by comicjk 3y ago
The "camel means rope" story, while cute and not implausible, is basically a guess. All the earliest available sources say "camel" - there is no actual evidence of this mistake beyond speculation (though it is admittedly an ancient speculation, as early as Cyril of Alexandria). The Wikipedia page has a much more balanced summary than this page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_of_a_needle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_of_a_needle
- timbit42 3y agoHow much time is there between the oldest source and when it was originally written?
- comicjk 3y agoBoth the original writing, and the surviving manuscripts, have uncertainty bounds of decades in their dates. The oldest physical pages we still have come from the years 100-200 or so. And assuming that a description of an event can't be written before the event happened (a touchy subject in this case), then the original writing of the Gospels must have been after the start of the First Jewish-Roman War in the year 66. So the gap between the writing and our extant sources could be pretty short, or could be over a century. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_manuscript#Earliest_extant_manuscripts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_manuscript#Earliest_e... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel#Composition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel#Composition