3 ms·
This article really piqued my interest, so I did some further research into these claims. - The source of the "illiteracy costs $2T/year": https://www.barbarab
by nunez 3y ago
This article really piqued my interest, so I did some further research into these claims.
- The source of the "illiteracy costs $2T/year": https://www.barbarabush.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/BBF_Annual_Report_2022.pdf https://www.barbarabush.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/BBF_A...
- Literacy is a global problem. There are myriad reasons why people don't learn how to read. It is very difficult to learn _anything_ when your housing is at risk, for example.
- Literacy in general is relatively new. We've been illiterate as a species for _way_ longer than we haven't, and reading/writing was an activity reserved for the elite for a long, long time. Literacy as a metric for social progress really started in the 1800s!
- UNESCO is responsible for collecting global literacy levels, but countries can choose how this data is collected. Self-reporting is very popular, as you can imagine. (This is a catch-22; to participate in these surveys, you have to be able to read...)
- The metric for how literacy was reported changed in the 2000s, and I'm not sure if data from prior years was normalized retroactively
As an aside, I think _this_ is the biggest reason why photo and video based social media took off. 1 in 3 people can't read beyond a fifth-grade level. Reading is HARD for a lot of people.
- Retric 3y agoThe ‘fifth grade level’ they use is a much higher bar than you likely assume. They include being able to write fairly well as part of the standard not just read and understand material. Quantitative literacy includes things like figuring out the correct tip split on a bill, something many successful people absolutely fail at. Calling those illiteracy is IMO abusing a term well outside the ordinary definition.