2 ms·
> Oh dear. 100kb is bad for this sort of thing? Does anyone know if that's a commonly held view? Not at all. For what you are actually getting 100kb is awesome
by zmmmmm 15y ago
> Oh dear. 100kb is bad for this sort of thing? Does anyone know if that's a commonly held view?
Not at all. For what you are actually getting 100kb is awesome.
However I like to develop really light pages especially for mobile. It's not even all about download size, mobile browsers can bog down even just parsing and keeping JS in memory.