4 ms·
It says 34% of adults lacking literacy proficiency were born outside the US, but not how many born outside the US are lacking literacy proficiency, and neither
by shikon7 3y ago
It says 34% of adults lacking literacy proficiency were born outside the US, but not how many born outside the US are lacking literacy proficiency, and neither how many born inside the US are.
It seems a bit misleading to state two similar facts (total rate vs rate of outside born) in such an incomparable way.
- rcyeh 3y agoAgreed, the presentation of summarized statistics in the web page seems intended to shock, and it’s hard to reconcile some numbers: According to the Census 2020 Current Population Survey[1]: * There are 44.9 MM foreign-born in the US, of which 95.9% are age 15 or more. Of the 39.5 MM (88% of foreign-born) age 25 and over: 13.6% do not have/86.4% have at least 8th-grade education; 75% have at least high-school diploma. * Total population of US is 331.45 MM, of which 81.4% are age 15-and-older, so foreign-born is 13.5% of total, or 16% of 15-and-older. If we believe that 21% of 15-and-older lack literacy proficiency, and 34% of those are foreign-born, then we multiply to get: 7% of 15-and-older are both foreign-born and lack literacy proficiency. But then comparing with the CPS, 7% of 15-and-older is nearly half of the 16% foreign-born fraction of 15-and-older, and seems inconsistent with the CPS statistic that more than 69% of 15-and-older foreign-born (75% of 25-and-older, which represent 88% of all foreign-born) have at least high school education. There are some basis risk problems (literacy statistics vs educational attainment; 2024 data vs 2020 data); but I would think those are probably rounding errors. I suspect the top-line 21% number is inflated. [1]: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2020/demo/foreign-born/cps-2020.html https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2020/demo/foreign-born/cp... , particularly tables 2.1 and 2.5