2 ms·
I wonder if this relation still holds with newer models that have have even more compute thrown at them? My intuition is that the structure inherent to languag
by mikewarot 3y ago
I wonder if this relation still holds with newer models that have have even more compute thrown at them?
My intuition is that the structure inherent to language makes Word2Vec possible. Then training on terabytes of human text encoded with Word2Vec + Positional Encoding makes it possible to then have the ability to predict the next encoding at superhuman levels of cognition (while training!).
It's my sense that the bag of words (as input/output method) combined with limited context windows (to make Positional Encoding work) is a huge impedance mismatch to the internal cognitive structure.
Thus I think that given the orders of magnitude more compute thrown at GPT-4 et al, it's entirely possible new forms of representation evolved and remain to be discovered by humans probing through all the weights.
I also think that MemGPT could, eventually, become an AGI because of the unlimited long term memory. More likely, though, I think it would be like the protagonist in Memento[1].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memento_(film) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memento_(film)
[edit - revise to address question]
- autokad 3y agosorry if I misread your comment, but you seem to be indicating that LLMs such as chat gpt (which use gpt 3+) are bag of words models? they are sequence models.
- mikewarot 3y agoI edited my response... I hope it helps... my understanding is that the output gives probabilities for all the words, then one is chosen with some random thrown in (via the #temperature) then fed back in... which to me seems to equate to bag of words. Perhaps I mis-understood the term.
- smaddox 3y agoBag of words models use a context that is a "bag" (i.e. an unorder map from elements to their counts) of words/tokens. GPT's use a context that is a sequence (i.e. an ordered list) of words/tokens.