3 ms·
I'll have a look. Thanks! I'll avoid using potentially transient details of Linux's ELF loader, though, since I use `btry` daily and don't want to tempt fate to
by meribold 3y ago
I'll have a look. Thanks! I'll avoid using potentially transient details of Linux's ELF loader, though, since I use `btry` daily and don't want to tempt fate to have it suddenly break following a kernel update too much. (Perhaps that's a bit silly given the hardcoded `/sys` path and syscall numbers.)
- LegionMammal978 3y agoYou're in the clear with the syscall numbers, at least. Linux treats them as part of the stable public API for each platform. If they want to update a syscall, they have to make a new version with its own number, and keep the old version around for as long as x86-64 is supported.