5 ms·
You're understanding perfectly. The way this works is that it sends a slow drip of junk before the SSH version banner string. A scanner running at any real scal
by gnfargbl 3y ago
You're understanding perfectly. The way this works is that it sends a slow drip of junk before the SSH version banner string. A scanner running at any real scale is going to have an overall timeout beyond which it doesn't bother waiting any longer for the banner string.
This is going to very slightly irritate some of the extremely low-level actors. Is setting up a tool to do that a good use of time?
If you want to effectively deter attackers using a sand-trap approach, you need to find some kind of task with asymmetric cost in your favour. This isn't that.
- eddd-ddde 3y agoWhat is a good example of assymetrical cost in your favour?