> Sounds to me like it could be the engineering equivalent of reducing SLO thresholds and admitting defeat either due to not enough traffic or not enough capaci

> Sounds to me like it could be the engineering equivalent of reducing SLO thresholds and admitting defeat either due to not enough traffic or not enough capacity to deal with the problem properly [1] No, actually, the article describes it as a "change to the federal rule of evidence governing expert testimony, which emphasized courts' role in vetting experts' conclusions and methodology before allowing them to present evidence to a jury."