3 ms·
I think like you, their finance and lawyers are not stupid. They did the maths or already know. Doing actual scientific study might be more risky, proving prod
by cryptonym 3y ago
I think like you, their finance and lawyers are not stupid. They did the maths or already know.
Doing actual scientific study might be more risky, proving product is not good. Producing clean stuff might be impossible or too expensive, too risky to go there if regulation doesn't require it. They may have to pay reparation to existing customers.
- bluGill 3y agoThey are going to court - science is a very different bar. Even if the science shows it is safe, someone will testify that it isn't and sway the jury with how bad life is for the heirs of someone who died from cancer. Of course in reality science gives probabilities not absolutes and so the jury gets told this causes cancer in .0001% of cases but this person was that one even though there is no way to determine that and cancer has many different causes. What matters is what you can convince a jury who doesn't have a background in science or statistics.