Not one of the rationalizations Apple gives for any of the things they do are actually required in order to produce the desired functionality, including seconda

Not one of the rationalizations Apple gives for any of the things they do are actually required in order to produce the desired functionality, including secondary effects like the incentives of theives. I build you a house with very solid walls and doors. No one is getting in without the keys. I do not give you the keys. You have to ask me to let you in every time, and I decide if you're you and should be allowed in. It is a true statement that the house is secure from theives. It is not a true statement that you can't have the keys to your house because "security".