3 ms·
Really? I don't find it obvious that the current crop of AI is superior in any way to it's predecessors. If anything it's significantly worse if measured by the
by forgetfreeman 3y ago
Really? I don't find it obvious that the current crop of AI is superior in any way to it's predecessors. If anything it's significantly worse if measured by the consequences accruing to it's growing use. Art market down the drain, check. Gig writing gone, check. Programming literally eating itself...in progress. Massive terrorist attack missed by intel agencies because AI said no, check. Grid electricity demands prepped to skyrocket (wtf is global warming?), check. But hey, I guess it's neat that you can get ChatGPT to rewrite your resume in the style of Warhammer 40k...
- joegibbs 3y agoReally, do you really think that it’s no more advanced, or do you just not like it? The fact that it’s causing programming to eat itself and getting rid of gig writing means it’s more powerful. ELIZA couldn’t do that. Say what you want about nuclear bombs but they were undoubtedly a technological advancement, you couldn’t blow up an entire city with black powder.
- forgetfreeman 3y agoThe phrase used was "superior", not "advanced". Words mean things. This shit is breaking important things for no reason other than shareholder value. This is not superior.
- joegibbs 3y agoThe nuclear bomb is superior to TNT, the gun on the A10 Warthog is superior to a flintlock pistol. Like it or not, modern AI is superior because it is more fit for purpose than something that can’t do anything at all.
- forgetfreeman 3y agoYou find yourself in a position where you're forced to make an analogy with weapons of mass destruction and the lightbulb still won't go on? Some people's kids...