> It's the customers (i.e. "us") who are responsible for those emissions. And the cost is being passed on to those customers. So, by making fossil fuel project

> It's the customers (i.e. "us") who are responsible for those emissions. And the cost is being passed on to those customers. So, by making fossil fuel projects uninsurable, we will make fossil fuels more expensive, which will reduce consumption, and since it's ultimately we the consumers who consume those fossil fuels (and their products), it seems "fair" that we have to pay for our indulgence. Sounds like the policy is going to work exactly as intended?